The Don of NXT is still running the joint

Let's get one thing straight: Tony D'Angelo is the boss of NXT, and if you disagree, you probably think ketchup belongs on a well-done steak. Watching him work this babyface championship run has been the professional wrestling equivalent of finding a twenty-dollar bill in your winter coat pocket. As noted in the recent PWTorch Dailycast, he is arguably having the best babyface reign in recent memory, and it's not even close. Tony manages to carry the aura of a Scorsese character while somehow making us cheer for him every Tuesday.

However, the internet is never happy. Over on the forums, the consensus is split right down the middle, like a chaotic Thanksgiving dinner. You've got your die-hard loyalists who see a masterclass in character work. One fan remarked, "Tony D is the only guy who can turn a gimmick that shouldn't work into a genuine top-tier attraction without losing the humor." That is high praise, and frankly, it is earned.

The monster booking dilemma

Then we have the skeptics who are laser-focused on the Zaria versus Lizzy Rain bout this past Monday. I saw a thread that turned into a full-blown argument over whether that match went five minutes too long. The NXT Hits and Misses report perfectly captured this vibe: was it a fun match, or were they overcomplicating Zaria's path to becoming an unstoppable monster? If you're building a destroyer, she should be smashing people in 3 minutes, not grinding out a technical clinic.

Some contrarians argued that a longer competitive match actually serves the division better than another squash. Another user commented, "Let the women wrestle! A ten-minute back-and-forth makes the eventual title shot feel way more legitimate than another two-minute steamroll." I get both sides, but let's be real—monster heels are dead if they go 50/50 with the mid-card. If you want Zaria to feel like a final boss, quit making her play nice for double-digit minutes.

Stagnation or just a slow burn?

The conversation regarding Lola Vice has also reached a fever pitch. People are starting to whisper that her character is hitting a wall. Is it a stall in development, or are we just addicted to the fast-paced nature of modern wrestling where we demand a character arc shift every three weeks? It’s arguably an unfair expectation, but that’s the reality of the business now. You either evolve at breakneck speed or you get left behind in the algorithm.

Meanwhile, the rest of the industry is chugging along with its own brand of absurdity. Over in TNA, the booking team seems to be throwing darts at a board with the KC Navarro and Mustafa Ali situation. Giving Navarro a shot at the International Championship after a pinfall victory is classic hot-shot booking, and quite frankly, the match concept itself was pure headache-fuel. Sometimes you just have to laugh at the chaotic choices promotions make to keep the lights on.

My final verdict on the state of the product

So, where does that leave us? I think the "Tony D" camp has the stronger argument, but only because they acknowledge the character work that keeps eyes on the product. The skeptics worrying about monster pacing are right about the logic, but wrong about the necessity of spectacle. Wrestling needs a bit of padding to fill the 2-hour block, even if it feels a little uneven at times.

We are currently in a weird spot where the quality of individual matches is reaching a ceiling, but the long-term storytelling feels like it's drifting. Some of you might be looking for a change, but if you look at the stats on average match times, you'll see the promotion is keeping a consistent heartbeat. Just don't let it flatline. We need high stakes, not just filler matches that result in a 50 percent chance of a title challenge that nobody asked for. Keep the fire going, Tony. The rest of you, stop worrying about the run times and enjoy the show.